Alliant International University-San Diego D grade
On the fields this project checks, this institution left more unpublished than published.
- Disclosure score
- 64%
- State
- CA
- IPEDS unit id
- 110468
What was disclosed
| Field | Status | What that means |
|---|---|---|
| Admission rate | Implausible | A value was published but falls outside the credible range for this field. Counted as a disclosure failure: a gap is visible to a reader, a wrong number is not. |
| Completion rate, 150% of normal time | Not reported | No value and no stated reason. This is the one that counts against a publisher. |
| Enrollment | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| In-state tuition | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| Median debt at completion | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| Median earnings 10 years after entry | Reported | A credible value was published. |
Values that do not look like measurements
These were published, so they are not gaps. They fall outside the credible range for their field, which is a judgement this project made and states in full so it can be argued with.
- Admission rate published as
0.Peer check, private for-profit certificate-predominant institutions in CA: 49 comparable institutions, but only 6 publish this field at all; too few to draw a conclusion
Same proportion bounds as completion. An exact zero would mean the institution admitted no applicant at all, which is an artifact rather than a policy. Note that open-enrollment institutions legitimately have no admission rate; those are expected to arrive as an explicit not-applicable rather than as a zero, and are excluded from the denominator when they do.
This is a measure of disclosure, not of quality. An institution that reports everything and performs badly scores higher here than a good school that reports nothing, and that is intended. If you believe a field is marked wrongly, the methodology states every rule and the reasoning behind it.