Institute for Business and Technology D grade
On the fields this project checks, this institution left more unpublished than published.
- Disclosure score
- 50%
- State
- CA
- IPEDS unit id
- 115931
What was disclosed
| Field | Status | What that means | Comparable institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admission rate | Not reported | No value and no stated reason. This is the one that counts against a publisher. | 6 of 49 publish it (12%) |
| Completion rate, 150% of normal time | Not reported | No value and no stated reason. This is the one that counts against a publisher. | 3 of 49 publish it (6%) |
| Enrollment | Reported | A credible value was published. | 49 of 49 publish it (100%) |
| In-state tuition | Not reported | No value and no stated reason. This is the one that counts against a publisher. | 3 of 49 publish it (6%) |
| Median debt at completion | Reported | A credible value was published. | 40 of 49 publish it (82%) |
| Median earnings 10 years after entry | Reported | A credible value was published. | 45 of 49 publish it (92%) |
Compared against private for-profit certificate-predominant institutions in CA, this institution excluded. The denominator is the institutions the field actually reached: peers that suppressed it, and peers the requirement does not reach, leave it rather than being counted as failures. A group of fewer than 10 says so instead of printing a share, and a field none of them were asked says that too — the share would be a division by nothing, and a zero there would say every comparable institution had failed to publish it.
This is a measure of disclosure, not of quality. An institution that reports everything and performs badly scores higher here than a good school that reports nothing, and that is intended. If you believe a field is marked wrongly, the methodology states every rule and the reasoning behind it.
Check this page against the federal record
Every classification above was derived from one row of a committed federal capture by rules kept in this repository. The receipt beside this page is that derivation, machine-readable: the capture it came from and its digest, the version of the rules that read it, and each field's classification. It carries the value of an implausible field, because that number is what this page argues with; it carries no other value, because a list of one college's tuition, earnings and completion rate beside a letter grade would be a performance record.
Machine-readable receipt (receipt.json)
Replay it against the same committed file, with no key and no network. The command exits 0 when the replay agrees with the receipt and names the field when it does not.
disclosed verify-receipt receipt.json --source sample.jsonCite this record
Institute for Business and Technology, disclosure receipt for IPEDS unit id 115931. Graded by rules version 2026-09-06.1 from sample.json (sha256 012bc6010d99), walked on a date the source file does not record.