Strayer University-District of Columbia D grade
On the fields this project checks, this institution left more unpublished than published.
- Disclosure score
- 64%
- State
- DC
- IPEDS unit id
- 131803
What was disclosed
| Field | Status | What that means |
|---|---|---|
| Admission rate | Not reported | No value and no stated reason. This is the one that counts against a publisher. |
| Completion rate, 150% of normal time | Implausible | A value was published but falls outside the credible range for this field. Counted as a disclosure failure: a gap is visible to a reader, a wrong number is not. |
| Enrollment | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| In-state tuition | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| Median debt at completion | Reported | A credible value was published. |
| Median earnings 10 years after entry | Reported | A credible value was published. |
Values that do not look like measurements
These were published, so they are not gaps. They fall outside the credible range for their field, which is a judgement this project made and states in full so it can be argued with.
- Completion rate, 150% of normal time published as
0.Peer check, private for-profit bachelor's-predominant institutions in DC: only 0 comparable institutions; too few to draw a conclusion
A rate is a proportion, so anything outside 0 to 1 is a unit error rather than a measurement. An exact zero is treated as an artifact because an institution that graduated nobody in the cohort would not still be reporting; two institutions in a 600-school sample publish exactly zero here.
This is a measure of disclosure, not of quality. An institution that reports everything and performs badly scores higher here than a good school that reports nothing, and that is intended. If you believe a field is marked wrongly, the methodology states every rule and the reasoning behind it.